Comparing CO2 Laser Wedge Resection to Radial Incision With Dilation in the Endoscopic Treatment of Benign Tracheal Stenosis: A Systematic Review

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/bronchology/fulltext/2026/04010/comparing_co2_laser_wedge_resection_to_radial.11.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/bronchology/SmallThumb.01436970-202604010-00011.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>Background: Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy is widely used in the endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis (BTS). However, the comparative effectiveness of its 2 principal techniques—CO2 laser wedge resection and radial incision with dilation—remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the recurrence rates of BTS following CO2 laser wedge resection versus radial incision with dilation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central through March 28, 2025. Three independent reviewers (C.Z., N.K., and A.H.) performed study screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. A random-effect model was applied for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was to compare recurrence rates between wedge resection and radial incision. Results: Twelve trials, including 685 patients met inclusion criteria. CO2 laser wedge resection was associated with a lower recurrence rate (43.2%) compared with those treated with radial incision with dilation (66.1%), approaching statistical significance (χ²=3.75, P=0.053). At follow-up beyond 3 years, this difference became significant (55.8% vs. 81.0%, χ²=9.46, P=0.002). Wedge resection also showed longer time to first recurrence. Reported complication rates were low across both techniques. Conclusion: CO2 laser wedge resection may be superior to radial incision with dilation in reducing recurrence of BTS, particularly over long-term follow-up. Personalized treatment strategies considering procedural variables and patient-specific factors are warranted to optimize outcomes.